RESEARCH INTERESTS
Examining the strategic interaction between governments, terrorists & the populations they target
Unpacking the psychological foundations and consequences of violence & conflict
Studying the strategic dynamics of Israeli-Palestinian violence and its effects on political attitudes & public health
Exploring the changing dynamics of conflict in the modern era, including insurgency & cyber-warfare
Investigating the role of leaders & bureaucracies in shaping security policy
Researching how group attitudes shape political behavior & inter-group relationships
ABOUT ME
I am an Assistant Professor in the Political Science Department at Washington University in St. Louis beginning July 2019. I completed my PhD in Political Science at the University of Michigan in May 2019.
My research and teaching lie at the intersection of international relations, conflict, and behavioral approaches to politics. I specialize in the psychological causes and consequences of political violence for the mass public, elite decision-making in conflict contexts, and strategic adaptation in modern warfare.
In my research, I bridge rational and behavioral approaches to examine the micro-foundations of political conflict, identifying the systematic ways in which psychological processes impact cycles of war and political violence. Though I explore broad cross-national trends, I also have a regional expertise in the Middle East and Israel-Palestine.
​
My work is published or forthcoming at a number of journals, including Journal of Conflict Resolution, Journal of Peace Research, Political Psychology, Public Opinion Quarterly, and European Psychologist. My book, The Polythink Syndrome (with Alex Mintz), was awarded the 2016 Alexander George Book Award by the International Society of Political Psychology for best book in the field of political psychology.
​
In my current book project, "Risk or Retribution: The Micro-foundations of State Responses to Terror," I examine how public perceptions of threat and desire for retribution shape and constrain policy-makers’ responses to terrorist violence. I show that the moral outrage of citizens to terrorism drives both militant group tactics and state counterterror policies. By constraining democratically elected leaders' policy options and encouraging them to strongly retaliate, public outrage can indirectly fuel an increasing reliance by militant groups on terrorism, as counterterror efforts limit their ability to execute more difficult guerrilla tactics.
EDUCATION
University of Michigan
2013 - 2019
Doctoral Candidate in Political Science
MA in Political Science (2015)
Major: International Relations
Minors: Political Psychology &
Political Methodology
IDC Herzliya
2009 - 2010
Masters of Government
Magna Cum Laude
Concentration:
Diplomacy & Conflict Studies
University of Michigan
2005 - 2009
Bachelor of Arts
Highest Distinction
Majors: Political Science & History